Outsourcing

A CompsimTM Process

 

Objective:  The objective of this paper is to define a process for evaluating outsourcing issues that might be addressed by an organization. 

 

When considering a series of options where outsourcing is one of the options, one should consider a multi-phased effort.

 

Phase 1:  {Problem Identification}

 

First you need to identify the problem that you are interested in solving.  In most, if not all cases, the problem you are trying to solve is not outsourcing.  The problem may be focused on reducing expenses, obtaining access to technology, reducing headcount, increasing operating efficiency or some other business reason.  Outsourcing all or part of a function may be one of the options.

 

Phase 1A:  {Management Clarification}

 

If there are guidelines or management directives that may impact some of the options they should be documented.  These management directives might limit: adding new resources, capital spending, or additional expenses.  These directives will likely impact consideration for some of the options.

 

Phase 1/1A Deliverables:

 

Using the Compsim’s business management tools, the result of Phase 1 and 1A leads to the development of the top level issue (title and description details) that defines the problem to be solved.

 

Phase 2:  {Alternative Solutions}

 

Identify (brainstorm) alternative solutions.  Each of these alternatives should be explained (Title and Description). This will give a reviewer that is not knowledgeable about the subject, sufficient detail to understand the alternatives being considered.  The list should be inclusive.

 

Outsourcing a complete function, part of a function, or several functions may each be considered alternative solutions.

 

Phase 3: (Optional)  {Prioritized Alternative Solutions}

 

It may be possible to rank and weight the different optional solutions as to their value to the organization.  This phase is only done if the options carry some obvious preferences.  If there are no preferences for specific solutions, then no prioritization of the positions is necessary.  In most cases we will use the arguments to validate the options in order to make the most appropriate selection.

 

Phase 4:  {Supporting and Objecting Arguments}

 

Identify the supporting and objecting arguments for each of the optional solutions.  Remember to refer to the Management Guidelines from Phase 1A.

 

The CompsimTM Issue “What should be considered in a general topic called "outsourcing"?” has a position identified as ”Compatibility with Objectives”, with a child issue titled:  “What objectives might be satisfied with "outsourcing"?”  The child positions of this issue may be of value in defining some of the reasons the potential solution would be appropriate.  

 

Another area of the CompsimTM Issue “What should be considered in a general topic called "outsourcing"?” focuses on Cost.  The positions responding to “What costs might be associated with outsourcing?” can be used to key in on some of the objecting arguments.  The same is true for the issue “What risks might be associated with outsourcing?”.

 

Utilize these hints and other opinions and observations to justify each of the identified solutions.  Refine the data with input from individuals or teams, listing additional details that explain why each of the arguments is important.

 

Phase 5:  {Prioritize the supporting and objecting arguments}

 

Utilize the ‘drag-and-drop-plus’ capabilities of Compsim’s tools to prioritize and weight the supporting and objecting arguments as they impact your business decision.

 

Phase 6:  {Initial Option Selection Report}

 

Prepare appropriate reports of the raw data as desired.

 

Utilize the decision-making report from Compsim’s tools to determine the preferred option.  Review the report in detail along with the raw data to insure that you are comfortable with the decision.  If you are not, then review the raw data items and their respective impact priorities for items that might be adjusted.


Phase 7:  {Outsourcing}

 

Assuming that Outsourcing was one of the preferred solutions, it is important to perform a more in-depth analysis of the impacts, costs, and risks.  In the initial phases 4 and 5, there may have been an expectation of associated costs or cost savings. 

 

The CompsimTM top level analysis utilized above:  “What should be considered in a general topic called "outsourcing"? includes several other segmentation topics that should be reviewed.  They focus specifically on topics that need to be understood when developing an outsourcing relationship with an outsourcing supplier. 

 

Now it is important that this information be refined and reviewed.

 

To do this you will need to work with your outsourcing supplier and your own administration group.  You may have been initially estimating some of the cost items.  At this point you need to more fully develop the pricing details to insure that your estimates in phases 4 and 5 are correct.

 

You also need to evaluate the risk items.  In some cases you may have identified risks that may have reduced the impact of some of the options.  When dealing with the outsourcing supplier, you may be able to reduce or limit the risk of some of the items as part of the negotiations.  These could take the form of performance guarantees or an increased understanding of the working relationship.

 

Phase 8:  {Service Level Agreement}

 

The final phase of the outsourcing plan will be to develop the Service Level Agreement with the Outsourcing Supplier.  This is your chance to limit the risks you have identified with the plan.  The CompsimTM Issue: “What should be considered in a general topic called "outsourcing"?” has a section that covers a number of items that could be considered part of the SLA.  This information can be used to guide your legal department in the definition of the terms and conditions.


Phase 9:  {Post Mortem}

 

Assuming that you have decided to move forward with the outsourcing agreement and have successfully negotiated an agreeable SLA and have operated under that agreement for six months or so, it is appropriate to review what worked well and what didn’t.

 

If you found that unidentified costs were encountered or that unexpected savings were obtained, then you will want to highlight the impacts in a copy of the analysis.  If you feel that you will likely be performing additional outsourcing investigations in the future, you should create templates of the options for rapid deployment.

 

It may be appropriate to prepare a “Best Practices” report.

 

 

Thomas M. Keeley

Compsim LLC

12 February 2002

 

Copyright 2002 Compsim LLC; All Rights Reserved